I had a CZ 527 in 223. I couldnt warm up to the higher proprietary scope ring sort, backwards security and protruding mag. A related excellent gun with round leading for common scope bases and internal flush magazine would be good. Theres been quite a few versions imported more than time, they in no way look to final lengthy although.
For the variety you are speaking, it appears like a 30-30 would do properly. Ive come to be enamored of the angle eject Winchester 94s. They came with out a crossbolt or tang security when they had been 1st brought out in the 1980s. Clean examples look to be out there in the $400 variety. The Leupold bases and low rings function really properly, other tends to make and forms look as well tall to me. They came with see-by way of rings, but the ones ive handled seemed like the worst attainable aspect of all the things. Slow to get on the scope, appear weird and awkward, and its not simple to have a receiver sight to use with them. I just choose the scope to sit correct exactly where my eye is searching when I throw the gun up to shoot. I can reside with out quickly out there irons. With a 1-4x leupold scope I can clearly see three feet from the muzzle, and can see the barrel properly in the scope. Theres zero sensible loss of speed or close variety use potential lost with a definitely great scope and and not left on a as well higher energy for basic use. A single can hit operating rabbits with such a scope and set up appropriately so you dont have to hunt about to locate the image in the scope. The target image must seem like magic with the crosshair on it when set up appropriately and thrown up rapidly.
The angle ejects look like a secret to quite a few. I nevertheless see comments about how significantly simpler marlins are to scope than Winchesters. Apparently the word hasnt gotten out about the angle ejects that they began generating about 40 years ago. I assume is a single of the very best items theyve ever accomplished to the 94 action.