Wildlife managers object to Minnesota DNR’s timber program – Twin Cities

[ad_1]

Minnesota Division of Organic Sources leadership is mismanaging the upcoming timber harvest, according to state wildlife leaders.

In a letter obtained by Minnesota Public Radio News , 28 DNR workers stated the mishandling could danger altering state forest lands for the animals that rely on them, as effectively as guests. The group — comprised of wildlife managers, assistant wildlife managers and scientists — outlined its issues in the letter final month to Commissioner Sarah Strommen and Assistant Commissioner Bob Meier.

The letter stated that the DNR’s program to boost timber harvest by eight.75 % does not account for the greatest offered science. They “do not think it is scientifically truthful or transparent to say that the 10-year timber program is ‘beneficial to wildlife,’” specially on wildlife management locations.

Critics argue the agency’s program could harm particular habitats and worsen invasive species issues, largely mainly because of comprehensive clear-cutting of forests.

DNR leadership denied the claims and stands behind its sustainable timber harvest evaluation, or STHA.

“The STHA utilised the greatest information we have and explored lots of options,” Strommen wrote in a response to the letter. “In reality, most of the employees and modeling work focused on understanding problems about non-timber values.”

Deputy DNR Commissioner Barb Naramore stated the program stays accurate to the intent of wildlife management locations.

“We recognize that each and every management action we take added benefits some sorts of wildlife a lot more than other sorts of wildlife,” Naramore stated. “We are managing our wildlife management locations for an abundance of a range of wildlife species.”

The wildlife managers stated that they’re committed to acquiring the target quantity of timber beneath DNR’s program, but disagree with the present way of performing so.

“It is our opinion that in order to partially mitigate the damaging effects of annually harvesting 870,000 (and possibly a lot more tamarack and ash) cords to a big quantity of wildlife species, there ought to be modifications to how the STHA is getting implemented,” the letter stated.

Amongst numerous recommended modifications to the evaluation, the wildlife managers are asking for significantly less of the harvest to come from the lands they handle. At the moment, 12% of the harvest would come from wildlife lands.

DNR leadership stated wildlife managers can reiterate their issues for the duration of annual examination of stands place up for harvest.

[ad_2]

Latest posts