GUN VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDERS: Yet another Tax Funded Study That Reveals Practically nothing

0
18


Did you know your tax dollars are becoming made use of to assistance and expand laws that would brand you as GUILTY – till verified innocent?  That is proper – this backasswards movement is acquiring a lot of interest, in America, exactly where we have been assured for 200 plus years to be INNOCENT till verified guilty.

Why?  Since the magic tiny “red flag” pill becoming pushed by leftists and some confused conservatives as a resolution to mass shootings starts with the presumption of guilt – even even though no crime has been committed.  What’s extra, our tax dollars are becoming made use of to push this unsafe agenda – which also violates the 2nd, 5th, 6th and 14th Amendments.

Just this week, a hugely partisan group of researchers at UC Davis released a study stating that California’s Gun Violence Restraining Orders “appear” to be functioning.  Garen Wintemute, the director of the Violence Prevention Study System did, even so admit “We can not prove that the orders are accountable for the outcome.”

Now that is some seriously strong scientific proof proper there.

Democrat and anti-twond Amendment Assemblyman Phil Ting went even additional with his evaluation, calling the analysis actual proof that gun manage is efficient. “It proves that powerful gun manage measures function,” Ting mentioned. “You have potentially 21 people today who could have carried out violent acts who are not in a position to simply because their guns have been taken away.”

GOC is quite darn positive that he would be laughed out of any scientific study for drawing a definitive conclusion employing the word “potentially”, but that just does not look to matter.  The push is on to additional expand California’s GRVOs – and Governor Newsom has promised to sign any bill that accomplishes this.

GOC Executive Director Sam Paredes has been fielding media calls ever considering the fact that the report was created public.  “There is no way for them to quantify what would have occurred had they not issued court orders – there is no scientific logic to the study simply because there is zero comply with-up of the person who has had their guns removed. No mental overall health evaluation, no absolutely nothing.

Conversely, 3 males have been arrested in other components of the nation just after threatening mass shootings on social media.  To make the arrests, regional law enforcement acted on current state laws that outlawed written or digital threats.  Rather than an absence of law, it was an absence of comply with-even though – a great deal like the flawed analysis from UC Davis.

“So guns are removed – how is that acquiring to the heart of the trouble?” Paredes continued.  “We’ve mentioned it ahead of – GVROs/red flag laws are insincerity on steroids.”

Additional demonstrating the shameful consequences of red flag laws, appear no additional than Florida, exactly where a man’s guns have been seized simply because he had the very same name as a domestic violence abuser.  He lost his guns with no hearing, and should wait till a court date later this month to petition their return – this just after proving to police they had the incorrect guy. Now that is criminal.